<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dish Network versus Direct TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.direct-vs-dish.com/blog/dish-network-versus-direct-tv.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.direct-vs-dish.com/blog/dish-network-versus-direct-tv.html</link>
	<description>Satellite TV Articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:35:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe L.</title>
		<link>http://www.direct-vs-dish.com/blog/dish-network-versus-direct-tv.html/comment-page-1#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 22:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.direct-vs-dish.com/blog/?p=36#comment-273</guid>
		<description>Hi Joe here and as a DISH Network employee, just ran across this post. Working as a DISH Network employee is that DISH Network to me offers the best equipment out there! My fav being a subscriber is the DVR functions. DISH unlike Direct offers duo DVRS which means you can have two TVs hooked up to the same box in two different rooms, DISH Network has the best equip out on the market. DISH has received awards for there equip.  this gives you the ability to have two recordings set up at the same time. With Direct you have to have a DVR rcvr connected to each TV you want to set up with DVR capabilities, which in the long run gets a bit expensive! DISH all together is just less expensive and truly leads among them all in customer service! When comparing both satellite companies there are many close similarities as well as many differences. The biggest difference that I&#039;ve noticed working as a DISH Network employee is that DISH unlike Direct, offers HD programming for free for qualified customers, whereas Direct only offers it for customers paying for their highest packages. DISH offers the free HD even for the lowest basic America&#039;s top 120. So it saves over $120 a year with DISH just on that. Both are great companies, but in the long run I would say DISH definitely has an advantage among the two both with lower pricing and great customer service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joe here and as a DISH Network employee, just ran across this post. Working as a DISH Network employee is that DISH Network to me offers the best equipment out there! My fav being a subscriber is the DVR functions. DISH unlike Direct offers duo DVRS which means you can have two TVs hooked up to the same box in two different rooms, DISH Network has the best equip out on the market. DISH has received awards for there equip.  this gives you the ability to have two recordings set up at the same time. With Direct you have to have a DVR rcvr connected to each TV you want to set up with DVR capabilities, which in the long run gets a bit expensive! DISH all together is just less expensive and truly leads among them all in customer service! When comparing both satellite companies there are many close similarities as well as many differences. The biggest difference that I&#8217;ve noticed working as a DISH Network employee is that DISH unlike Direct, offers HD programming for free for qualified customers, whereas Direct only offers it for customers paying for their highest packages. DISH offers the free HD even for the lowest basic America&#8217;s top 120. So it saves over $120 a year with DISH just on that. Both are great companies, but in the long run I would say DISH definitely has an advantage among the two both with lower pricing and great customer service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew@Pest Control La Porte</title>
		<link>http://www.direct-vs-dish.com/blog/dish-network-versus-direct-tv.html/comment-page-1#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew@Pest Control La Porte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.direct-vs-dish.com/blog/?p=36#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Agreed, with HD there just isn&#039;t anything better than satellite.  it just has a much bigger range of things to offer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, with HD there just isn&#8217;t anything better than satellite.  it just has a much bigger range of things to offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.direct-vs-dish.com/blog/dish-network-versus-direct-tv.html/feed ) in 0.14647 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 3:03 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 4:03 pm UTC -->
